April 27, 2009

14 Koans of Knowledge Management

  1. We arrived at the "Age of Knowledge" at exactly the same moment we reached the end of certainty. This might not be a coincidence.
  2. To capture, compress and convey knowledge, why do we waste time writing software? Why aren't we writing poetry?
  3. If work is more collaborative than ever, why do I have to work so much harder and learn so many new things myself?
  4. We think knowledge workers use their heads more than their hands, but we ''know" by doing more than by thinking.
  5. If we share knowledge because of its value, sometimes we need to steward that value by not sharing.
  6. We think technology makes it possible, but it's all about tools.
  7. Knowledge is personal. Knowledge is social.
  8. Knowledge does not accrete in the mind. It is apprehended by the heart.
  9. We are drowning in information and knowledge, but starved for meaning and actionable belief.
  10. If people really act, not on what they know, but what they believe, why aren't we belief managers?
  11. KM relies on trust, but trust is inevitably unreliable.
  12. KM relies on leadership, but ultimately leadership has to emerge from everyone.
  13. KM doesn't work, but the reasons KM doesn't work have nothing to do with KM.
  14. KM doesn't work. But it has to.

Adapted from a talk at the Southern California KM Cluster, 2003

Apr 27, 2009 10:03:03 PM | SenseMaking (cognition, learning, KM & CI)

The comments to this entry are closed.

NEXT POST
From Technologies to Tools Think about the relationships we have to our communication and information tools, not just through our tools. Have we gone too far distinguishing knowledge work from manual labor, so that we disconnect knowledge workers from the tools of their trade—and in doing so disrupt their sense of identity? There is an affective connection between individuals and their tools that is vital to maintain both the productivity and the passion of knowledge work. But there is also a distinction between "tools" and "technologies" that is often missed in the modern workplace. "Technologies" are systems imposed by the organization that often constrain, disempower and depersonalize knowledge work. "Tools" are extensions of our hands, as much as the hammers or knives of traditional work. They reinforce ownership, craftsmanship, stewardship and professional identity. Read the article: The Difference between Tools and Technologies NOTE: Preparing...
PREVIOUS POST
What’s Wrong with KM Definitions I think there are at least four problems with defining knowledge management: The more definitions the better. Ambiguity forces people to negotiate meaning rather than assume they have shared understanding (when in fact they really don't). A definition is worthless without defining knowledge, knowledge work, knowledge worker, knowledge economy, knowledge economics, learning, learning organizations, information, information management, etc. On the other hand, I'm not sure that knowledge is what really matters. People act on what they believe, not what they know. You never want to call it KM anyway. Many programs inculcate KM principles and values in every functional corner of the organization. But the best ones help people rediscover and then enhance every craft or culture's existing traditions of sharing and stewarding their expertise.

Steve

Steve Barth consults to international government, NGO, academic and corporate clients. Recent work has focused on organizational learning and KM strategies in economic development and peace and security. Award-winning writer specializing in organizational intelligence and knowledge worker productivity.

The Typepad Team

Search

My Other Accounts

Recent Comments